|
Les hautes falaises que toujours tu portes en toi, ouvre-les pour une
Parole, ouvre une aube dans le roc.
The high cliffs that you always carry
inside of you, open them for a Word, open a dawn in the rock.
– Edouard
Glissant
The transition to life as a doctoral student is distinctly
unlike any change, academic or otherwise, I have previously negotiated. After
just one semester, barely enough time for me to have stumble-fingered through
the first few pages of the thick tome of years remaining, I am exhausted. (This
is normal of course). An unanticipated shift in my relationship with books and reading,
however, upends my entire understanding of who I am as a reader, as a person
for whom reading and visiting libraries and bookstores are idyllic activities.
This crisis of reading specifically concerns the heightened fatigue and
word-overwhelm ensuing from the exaggerated
consumption and analysis of text required as a doctoral student.
Insufficiently offset by the soothing joy fragments that usually accompany what
has been a lifelong favored activity, the function of books in my reading-living
reality is in some disarray. Suddenly, I am a reader who does not always
want to read but who now must read and who is also afraid to stop
reading.
This dilemma affects me so fiercely because I am passionate
about and dedicated to researching how books, reading, libraries and stories have
helped to console, distract, entertain and educate suffering people in the
past, and how they continue to do so today. I have spent the past four years
immersed in the early stages of a search for evidence of Jews using libraries
and reading and the sharing of books and stories as elements in their struggle to
survive under Nazi control during the Holocaust. Thus far my focus has been on
the ghetto concentration camp Theresienstadt. Having discovered that many did
indeed consider reading and stories vital to their survival, I am convinced of
the absolute necessity of continuing and expanding this research, and feel a
sense of urgency to do so. The tired ambiguity I currently feel toward these
long-trusted and life-affirming tools, therefore, sparks a deep flood of empty
unfamiliarity and frustration within my reading body. Weary unease pools inside
my right eye socket, where pressure surrounds the eyeball like a squishy stress
ball clutched in a gently tightening palm. Seeking release, I yearn to restore
my desire and need to read,
which now teeter awkwardly on the edges of my shifting reader’s consciousness.
Treading uncertainly amidst this whirlwind of churning pages,
I grasp onto two hopeful idea threads to ground me. The first is the
realization that I must coax out, extract, the active and interactive reader
who exists, with mouth ready to speak, invisibly hidden beneath my solo, more
passive and quiet reader surface self. The second is the realization that
deciding to become an academic, even more than deciding to become a librarian
(which I already am), is to admit an obsession with books, with texts, ideas
and learning, and to commit to that obsession. Caught in the early
tumult of this new commitment, I find myself putting up great resistance, no
doubt contributing to the vision dimming headaches, icicle-cracked neck
vertebra, shrinking right eye, and brow that seems to no longer unfurrow. I
grudgingly admit that the source of my (body, brain, feeling) unsettled discomfort
is not only the endless and sometimes numbing books I have to read, but also of
my stubbornly ingrained perception of what reading is and what it should
be for me.
I grew up in the company of many full bookshelves lined with
fiction and non-fiction, their visible backbones displaying all colors, ages,
materials and stages of wear, and revealing titles in English, French,
Portuguese, German and Hebrew. The most appealing books to handle were worn
soft and curved, exuding the irresistible scent of musty frayed paper and
leather, their aged outer texture seeming to hold as many stories and possibilities
as the texts contained within. My reading mother (who favors fiction and texts
on psychology, counseling and Judaism) has long been active in a woman’s book
group and my reading father (who is partial to science fiction, short stories
and science, especially space and physics texts) led me and my sister on weekly
Saturday visits to the local library. Viewed together, my parent’s reading
habits and literary preferences offered me an early glimpse into how reading
can be multifunctional: social or solitary, professional or educational, and
can meet needs anywhere along an immense continuum, from distraction to
pleasure and everyplace in between.
Ever since I learned to read, the escape, solace,
information and opportunity offered by books have been critical elements within
my personal, internal realm. As a shy reader, books helped me fortify pathways
of connection to the external world, linking me moment to moment, word by word,
more simply than spoken language could. I experience reading as an intensely
inner and enclosed activity. Relying on books to nourish both the inside and
out of my being has led me to recognize how the deep intimacy of reading can be
wonderfully insulating, as well as surprisingly revealing. I have never much
liked to discuss, analyze, or even write about what I read (short
stories and non-fiction, particularly literary, bibliophilic, historic, culinary
and Judaic), although I rather like when others do in so far as their chatter
can lead me to (or from) books I have not yet read and might not otherwise have
come upon.
My disinclination to
communicate as a reader generated internal opposition to reading-related
assignments at an early age. Although I did well in school, the task of
decoding, interpreting or simply regurgitating what the author was “really
trying to say” struck me as pretentious, presumptuous, even futile. After all,
isn’t each reader’s voice as subjective and unique as each author’s? Why try to
explain, or worse, press upon another, my own fingerprint of understanding? Or
feel forced to accept that of another? Rather, digestion and understanding of a
text, in my view, was best achieved through unspoken mental rather than oral
contemplation of the words and ideas. The first person to truly crack this
shuttered shield and who began to convince me that speaking and writing about
books could be as satisfying and productive as reading them, was a remarkable
professor I had in library school. Dr. Carr elucidated how being a reader,
loving books and libraries, and caring and learning about other readers could
not only guide my personal life, but also inspire my professional life.
Already, putting these words to paper is helping me frame
and articulate the challenge I am confronting, that is, to mentally rearrange
and expand the capacity of my reading self. This requires a deconstruction
(as documented here) of my original, oversimplified, narrow tunnel approach,
followed by what will no doubt be a lifelong reconstruction to ever widen the
road I read along. I am juggling for a rewarding new balance between silence
and speech, between individual thought and group discussion, between reading
what I must with little time for what I want. I successfully completed my first
semester as a doctoral student and look forward to the start of the next, yet
my inclination to select and read a book, even for my own pleasure, remains
more diminished than I am familiar or at ease with. Nevertheless, turning to
the written word is what I know and in thinking and writing this I was drawn to
the expressions of others on the subject of reading. I came upon an essay I had
never encountered before, “The Solace of Books” by Israel Abrahams, published
in 1911. Captivating in its entirety, one sentence in particular resonates with
blunt immediacy. I read and reread it: “Reading profits most when, beside the
book, you have someone with whom to talk about the book.” The belief that
discussion, interaction and commentary are at least as important as whatever is
contained in the original text is of course an extremely Jewish conviction. It
seems it is time for me to accept, embrace, and act upon this very vocal aspect
of my inheritance. As a determined and committed doctoral student, as well as a
shy reader, devoted librarian and quiet learner, I recognize this transition
and evolution as a growth and expansion that will occur without any disquieting
loss of deep-rooted identity. The shift in my relationship with books and
reading promises to remain a critical aspect in the formation of my academic
self, as well as in the continuation of my private self.
|